Memory hides from me where the
inspiration came from, but as a teenager I would enjoy asking friends
a certain question. I would say, "If you had to be either deaf
or blind, which you rather be?"
Most of my friends usually thought
about it for a few seconds, and then they replied that they would rather be
deaf. Or, in other words, they valued their sight more than their
ability to hear. I began to think of this as a typical response from
people in England, because most of us in this country have a desire to be
independent.
Out of the five senses in our bodies,
the sense of sight is probably the one that gives us most independence. Lose your sight and you can't see in front of yourself,
can't read signs, and can't distinguish between colour coded
items.You need to ask a helper what is going on around you, and feel
which direction a guide-dog is pulling you towards for safety
when walking.
If you lost your sight, you would miss
out on anything which can be seen, such as landscapes and art. But
after those visuals, and the amount of independence, there isn't much
else which is lost. Conversation with other people, something
probably taken for granted, would not lessen, but probably become
even more of a pleasure because of how much your skill at listening
would improve. Books can be read in braille. Nature's textures can
still be felt.
You might not be surprised that my own
answer to my question was that I would prefer to lose my sight and
keep my sense of hearing, if given the choice. But for me, this is
largely because to the parts of life which I know I appreciate more.
For example, I am rarely excited by any
visual form of art, but I have a passion for music, both playing it
and listening to it. No amount of hours spent in art galleries could
compensate for the loss of my music collection or the ability to play
an instrument with others in a band.
I also value teaching, specifically by
word of mouth. I know that in a lecture theatre setting, I am
thinking more about what I hear from a teacher than from what I can
see. Office trainers know that the visuals provided in a presentation are there
to enable the visual-orientated attendees to easily focus and
remember the content, but the content itself is rarely just visual.
Even graphs and diagrams can be summarised in words in less time than it
took to create them.
So what would you choose, if you had
to? Would you prefer to lose your ability to see, or to hear? But when
you think you have an answer to this, I am also intrigued whether you
decided on your answer purely because of how much you value your independence, or because you know which parts of life really matter
to you?
Image source: http://www.myhousecallmd.com/archives/tag/emotion
hmmm I still think I'd rather lose my hearing; people have become so used to conversing by text these days, by email, facebook and blogs(!) that I think I could still have my conversations that way! I also think I'd miss watching actors responces etc on t.v. dramas - I'm not sure audio descriptions would live up to my expectations! I think losing your sight would make you more imaginative/creative though!
ReplyDelete